W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-bugzilla@w3.org > January 2010

[Bug 8741] New: Isn't pre-order the same as depth-first? That would make "pre-order, depth-first" redundant.

From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 11:30:56 +0000
To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
Message-ID: <bug-8741-2486@http.www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/>
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8741

           Summary: Isn't pre-order the same as depth-first? That would make
                    "pre-order, depth-first" redundant.
           Product: HTML WG
           Version: unspecified
          Platform: Other
               URL: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#dom-
                    trees
        OS/Version: other
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: HTML5 spec bugs
        AssignedTo: dave.null@w3.org
        ReportedBy: contributor@whatwg.org
         QAContact: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
                CC: ian@hixie.ch, mike@w3.org, public-html@w3.org


Section: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#dom-trees

Comment:
Isn't pre-order the same as depth-first? That would make "pre-order,
depth-first" redundant.

Posted from: 24.132.106.179


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 14 January 2010 11:30:58 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:01:09 UTC