W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-bugzilla@w3.org > January 2010

[Bug 8730] New: Buffering should not be a boolean "autobuffer" tag - but something along the lines of "buffermax= n%" There should also be a "no-cache" attribute - this will overcome expected objections from copyright holders

From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2010 07:15:21 +0000
To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
Message-ID: <bug-8730-2486@http.www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/>
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8730

           Summary: Buffering should not be a boolean "autobuffer" tag - but
                    something along the lines of "buffermax= n%" There
                    should also be a "no-cache" attribute - this will
                    overcome expected objections from copyright holders
           Product: HTML WG
           Version: unspecified
          Platform: Other
               URL: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#video
        OS/Version: other
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: HTML5 spec bugs
        AssignedTo: dave.null@w3.org
        ReportedBy: contributor@whatwg.org
         QAContact: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
                CC: ian@hixie.ch, mike@w3.org, public-html@w3.org


Section: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#video

Comment:
Buffering should not be a boolean "autobuffer" tag - but something along the
lines of "buffermax= n%" There should also be a "no-cache" attribute - this
will overcome expected objections from copyright holders

Posted from: 81.82.208.61


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 13 January 2010 07:15:22 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:01:09 UTC