http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8725 Summary: text/sandboxed-html vs <iframe sandbox> and backcompat Product: HTML WG Version: unspecified Platform: PC OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: HTML5 spec bugs AssignedTo: dave.null@w3.org ReportedBy: simonp@opera.com QAContact: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org CC: ian@hixie.ch, mike@w3.org, public-html@w3.org http://html5.org/tools/web-apps-tracker?from=4580&to=4581 text/sandboxed-html and <iframe sandbox> don't have the same backcompat story. Is this intentional? It seems to me that we either want a parameter for text/html or a new element. Also: do we care about sandboxed XHTML or SVG? -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.Received on Tuesday, 12 January 2010 12:14:23 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:01:09 UTC