- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 09 Jan 2010 07:44:45 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=7510 Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|NEEDSINFO |WONTFIX --- Comment #24 from Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> 2010-01-09 07:44:44 --- (In reply to comment #4) > no, it is not about supporting namespaces. If I'm going to question > the support for namespaces, will do so in a separate bug. (In reply to comment #23) > I believe what I'm asking for is clear enough: support for namespaced > elements in foreign content, such as MathML and SVG (In reply to comment #22) > I would to escalate this bug to the Issue Tracker. No, you haven't made your request clear at all. I've tried to add to the spec the exact text you've proposed. I've tried to tweak the text multiple times in response to your complaints that the text you proposed isn't adequate. You have contradicted yourself multiple times and I really haven't the faintest idea what you actually want, what problem you're trying to solve, or what you would consider an acceptable solution other than escalating this to a tracker issue. So: EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document: http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html Status: Rejected Change Description: no spec change Rationale: I cannot understand the request despite repeated efforts. Shelley apparently just wants an excuse to raise a tracker issue. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Saturday, 9 January 2010 07:44:47 UTC