W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-bugzilla@w3.org > January 2010

[Bug 8447] Tighter definition on the aside element

From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
Date: Fri, 08 Jan 2010 10:51:58 +0000
To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1NTCRi-0001c8-Do@wiggum.w3.org>
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8447


Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |WONTFIX




--- Comment #8 from Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>  2010-01-08 10:51:57 ---
EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are
satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If
you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please
reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML
Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest
title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue
yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document:
   http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html

Status: Rejected
Change Description: no spec change
Rationale: Concurred without counter-arguments above. As Shelley says, the
draft was updated based on feedback from Web developers. Given that Web
developers are the people who will be using this technology, that seems wise,
and not at all something to be ashamed of.


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 8 January 2010 10:51:59 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:01:09 UTC