- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 07 Jan 2010 11:53:28 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8661 Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #1 from Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> 2010-01-07 11:53:28 --- Yes and no. The exact authoring conformance criteria in this particular case are somewhat convoluted, and take up most of the "Dimension attributes" section. It's "yes" because displaying the image "unstretched" (from the user's perspective) might involve "stretching" it (from a technical perspective), if, e.g., the image resolution is not 96ppi. But it's "no" because you can't change the ratio. (It's also "yes" because you can "stretch" the image to 0x0.) I hope this clarifies matters... I fear it may not have. :-) EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document: http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html Status: Rejected Change Description: no spec change Rationale: I'm marking this "Rejected" because I didn't make any change to the spec. Please let me know if I misunderstood what you were saying. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 7 January 2010 11:53:30 UTC