- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 07 Jan 2010 10:29:22 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8667 Summary: Ability to style validation errors Product: HTML WG Version: unspecified Platform: PC URL: http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/forms.html#constraint- validation OS/Version: Windows NT Status: NEW Keywords: a11y Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: HTML5 spec bugs AssignedTo: dave.null@w3.org ReportedBy: gez.lemon@gmail.com QAContact: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org CC: ian@hixie.ch, mike@w3.org, public-html@w3.org, public- html-a11y@w3.org >From the UAWG: Under form validation there is no stipulation that validation errors should be stylable by the page author using CSS and are currently only available as per how the UA styles them unless the page author knows JavaScript. This I see as an issue if browsers simply implement an arbitrary styling that some users find hard to read. As such there needs to be scope for validation errors to be stylable (without relying on JavaScript) or browser implementations to be as readable / accessible as possible (the latter being pretty subjective). My other fear is that if forms validation can not be styled without JavaScript page authors may skip using HTML5 webform validation as it messes up their design. We then get to a situation where we have developers refusing to adopt webforms in HTML5 in favour of their own styled forms which potentially could be inaccessble. Users in turn miss out. Anecdotally I know of a web designer who works predominantly with users with cognitive problems and wont use webforms if they can't easily be styled without JavaScript. Proposal: require that all error validation be stylable by the page author without relying on JavaScript. Not sure if this is in scope of HTML5 or is under UAAG. I'm told this is not so easy for a UA to do and that if we want to make the default error messages styleable, we would need to approach the CSSWG with the problem and have them find a solution to make them styleable. Apparently it could possibly work if they provided some sort of pseudo-element. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 7 January 2010 10:29:24 UTC