- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2010 12:01:21 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8645 Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |NEEDSINFO --- Comment #1 from Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> 2010-01-06 12:01:20 --- EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document: http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html Status: Did Not Understand Request Change Description: no spec change Rationale: Please file just one issue per bug. Regarding #1, I do not see how the alt="" text advice applies to anything other than <img>. It seems very specific to <img> and seems like it would do the most good slap bang in the middle of that section, in the author's face, as it were. An appendix is too easy to ignore ("I'll read that accessibility stuff later"). Regarding #2, the spec already seems to say what you are asking for. Regarding #3, why would the title="" attribute on the element itself be less good that the figure caption, given that there might be multiple images in the figure? Regarding #4, WCAG is already mentioned in the "recommended reading" section. The #text-equiv part doesn't seem to say anything that isn't already covered in more detail by HTML5, though, so referencing it in that section doesn't seem especially useful to readers. Regarding #5, what's wrong with aria-describedby? -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 6 January 2010 12:01:22 UTC