- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2010 17:22:42 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10830 --- Comment #8 from Koji Ishii <kojiishi@gluesoft.co.jp> 2010-12-31 17:22:42 UTC --- Sorry for multiple comments in a row, but I was reading Yomiuri Online, the only news site that use ruby within major Japanese newspaper sites. I found they use rb tag. I then went to Google, typed "ruby" in Japanese, and looked into first 5 or 6 sites. All sites I saw there use rb tag too. >From what you said, I thought very few sites are using rb tag, but this quick and rough investigation resluted in opposite. This leads me to a question; would you mind if I ask what the scope of the research you mentioned was, and what the result was? How many pages/sites/authoring tools have rb tag today in your estimates, and how much the "short-term cost" is? If majorities are using rb tag, I don't understand the value of deprecating rb tag in HTML5. Rather, it could bring confusions. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 31 December 2010 17:22:44 UTC