- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2010 21:01:25 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11616
Aryeh Gregor <Simetrical+w3cbug@gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |Simetrical+w3cbug@gmail.com
--- Comment #2 from Aryeh Gregor <Simetrical+w3cbug@gmail.com> 2010-12-30 21:01:24 UTC ---
Proleptic UTC is logically problematic, given that you wouldn't know which
years had leap seconds. So assuming you had some unambiguous way to identify a
particular second in history, there might not be a well-defined algorithm to
associate it with a UTC timestamp. But this seems like a rather academic
objection, because nobody is tracking things back to Nero's birthday with
second- or minute-level accuracy.
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 30 December 2010 21:01:27 UTC