W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-bugzilla@w3.org > December 2010

[Bug 11244] Should we say that a <video> element doesn't plan when moved around in a document rather than removed?

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2010 08:19:58 +0000
To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1PXrGI-0005LN-Ki@jessica.w3.org>
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11244

Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |DUPLICATE

--- Comment #2 from Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> 2010-12-29 08:19:58 UTC ---
Well we'd probably do it using a synchronous section, not a task, but yeah, it
would clearly be more complex. See bug 11068, though.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 11068 ***

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 29 December 2010 08:20:00 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:01:36 UTC