W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-bugzilla@w3.org > December 2010

[Bug 11064] unstated requirement to be valid.

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2010 11:48:47 +0000
To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1PUeER-0008NS-3y@jessica.w3.org>
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11064

--- Comment #14 from Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi> 2010-12-20 11:48:46 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #12)
> I think that a mechanical representation of the rules (perhaps better in
> schematron or relaxng than dtd) would be a lot shorter than the document, so
> actually easier to see at a glance.

I think this is not a good idea, because polyglotness includes lower-level
constraints that can't be expressed in Schematron or RELAX NG. For example, the
requirement not to have an XML declaration and the requirement to have one of
the few doctypes can't be represented in Schematron or RELAX NG.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 20 December 2010 11:48:48 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:01:35 UTC