- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2010 21:16:59 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10799 --- Comment #14 from Vladimir Vukicevic (Mozilla) <vladimir@pobox.com> 2010-12-07 21:16:59 UTC --- (In reply to comment #11) > For createPattern, add the text: > > """ > If the original image data is a bitmap image, the value painted at a point in > the area of the repetitions is computed by filtering the original image data. > The user agent may use any filtering algorithm (for example bilinear > interpolation or nearest-neighbor). When the filtering algorithm requires a > pixel value from outside the original image data, it must instead use the value > from wrapping the pixel's coordinates to the original image's dimensions. (That > is, the filter uses 'repeat' behavior, regardless of the value of > <var>repetition</var>.) Hm, isn't this inconsistent? For example, if the pattern uses no-repeat, and is used to fill a rectangle larger than the pattern image size, this seems to say that the no-repeat setting is ignored. That seems odd and unexpected. The clamp-to-edge behavior is fine for drawImage, but for patterns, I think the only thing that mathematically makes sense is for the area outside of the source pixels to be treated as transparent black for no-repeat. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 7 December 2010 21:17:00 UTC