W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-bugzilla@w3.org > November 2009

[Bug 8396] New: clip() is fine, but why isn't there something like a stencil buffer? It's similar to clip except you turn on the stencil then render an image and only where you rendered the image are pixels rendered to the canvas.

From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 10:42:21 +0000
To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
Message-ID: <bug-8396-2486@http.www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/>
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8396

           Summary: clip() is fine, but why isn't there something like a
                    stencil buffer? It's similar to clip except you  turn on
                    the stencil then render an image and only where you
                    rendered the image are pixels rendered to the canvas.
           Product: HTML WG
           Version: unspecified
          Platform: Other
               URL: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-
                    work/#complex-shapes-(paths)
        OS/Version: other
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: HTML5 spec bugs
        AssignedTo: dave.null@w3.org
        ReportedBy: contributor@whatwg.org
         QAContact: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
                CC: ian@hixie.ch, mike@w3.org, public-html@w3.org


Section:
http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#complex-shapes-(paths)

Comment:
clip() is fine, but why isn't there something like a stencil buffer? It's
similar to clip except you  turn on the stencil then render an image and only
where you rendered the image are pixels rendered to the canvas.

Posted from: 75.5.229.136


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Sunday, 29 November 2009 10:42:30 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:01:05 UTC