- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 23:30:56 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8365 --- Comment #8 from Matt <matt-heard@otiose.net> 2009-11-24 23:30:55 --- (In reply to comment #3) > Comment with my Apple representative hat on: > Apple is a developer and vendor of multiple HTML UAs, including a web browser, > a widget runtime, a mail client, a chat application, a help viewer, a widget > IDE, a dictionary application, and a consumer-level Web page creator(*). All of > these UAs are based on the same underlying engine, WebKit. In addition, we ship > WebKit as public API on Mac OS X and iPhone OS, leading to many more innovative > types of HTML UAs. Comment with my developer hat on: I think this is backwards. Apple is not a developer and vendor of multiple HTML UAs, Apple is a developer and vendor of many different software products that display formatted text. And in all the cases you listed above, Apple has said, "You know, HTML would be good for that." (As opposed to, say, RTF.) We've spent the last 10 years transforming the web browser from a document delivery language to an application deployment platform. It's been a messy process (to say the least), and up until now, it's happened on a largely ad hoc basis. HTML5 promises to create a proper set of rules to define how a web browser should behave, and advance the platform in a lot of really important ways, which is very good. Web development is, as a rule, terrible, and I'm thrilled to see progress towards a single coherent standard for browser behavior. But where does that leave installed applications that just want to show a little bit of formatted text? If disentangling the formatting/parsing parts of the spec from the web-browser-specific parts would really break as many cross-references as you say, then why are you leaving it in the hands of implementers to make that division? It seems like a really bad sign for the simple little formatting language we all know and love. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 24 November 2009 23:31:07 UTC