- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 15:42:30 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8268 --- Comment #5 from Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi> 2009-11-12 15:42:30 --- (In reply to comment #4) > Replacing about:legacy-compat with the XHTML 1.0 Strict doctype would fail to > highlight that doctype is permitted only for legacy tools. That was worded badly. Trying again: Replacing about:legacy-compat with the XHTML 1.0 Strict doctype would fail to highlight that crufties doctype exists only to the benefit legacy tools. (The point is to make the alternative doctype unshiny so that pundits don't start preaching it for general usage.) -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 12 November 2009 15:42:32 UTC