- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 15:18:25 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=7059 Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |hsivonen@iki.fi --- Comment #1 from Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi> 2009-06-26 15:18:25 --- > I strongly suggest that you work with XQuery and XSL Working Groups, which produce the XPath specification, to come up with a better solution. Note that that's what I tried first. > In this discussion, the reason given for forking XPath is that some people do not want to implement XPath 2.0, which solves your problems. Browsers have XPath 1.0 implementations and don't have XPath 2 implementations. It isn't feasible to make the namespacing of elements in HTML DOMs gated on browsers implementing XPath 2.0. > XPath 2.0 was published 23 January 2007 (before your Working Group was even chartered), solves your problem, and is widely implemented. What's relevant is what the status quo of XPath support in browsers is. > And this incompatible version is not even a subset of XPath 2.0. I'd personally be OK with pursuing making prefixless expressions not to match no-namespace nodes in HTML documents Gecko if the WebKit developers are OK with making the same change to WebKit. Right now, the HTML5 spec, Gecko and WebKit agree, so we have interop and a spec that matches implementation, which is a pretty good situation to be in. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 26 June 2009 15:18:35 UTC