- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 09:32:15 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=7051 --- Comment #4 from Michael(tm) Smith <mike@w3.org> 2009-06-26 09:32:14 --- (In reply to comment #3) > I've considered this kind of thing in the past, but the main reason I haven't > done it is that I don't want to have features that are defined exclusively by > the IDL blocks, because it makes the spec harder to read (IMHO). > > How strongly do you feel about this? I think that for the intended audience in this particular case, it actually makes the spec easier to read, not harder. But I don't feel strongly about it. I just put it forward as something to consider. If you reckon the spec text around this is fine as is and would not benefit significantly from the proposed change, it's fine by me for this bug to just changed to resolution=wontfix. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 26 June 2009 09:32:24 UTC