- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2009 04:36:17 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6774 Nick Levinson <Nick_Levinson@yahoo.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|enhancement |major --- Comment #6 from Nick Levinson <Nick_Levinson@yahoo.com> 2009-06-08 04:36:17 --- We should add the risks of libel, defamation of character, interference with an advantageous business relationships, and other legal liabilities arising because of third-party content mistakenly attributed to the website owner, who may not have any knowledge of what is appearing in a user's browser. This could offend and lose visitors; it could also lead to a lawsuit. Both would be misdirected, but the website owner might have to prove to a court that they didn't have the content complained of. Since the owner can't see the user's browser and since the browser's additions will likely be intermittent or on irregular rotation, the website owner may be reduced to speculating on where the content appeared, a court may not buy speculation, and the court may order the website owner to come in to testify as to what content appeared on certain days. The plaintiff will swear it was there and the defendant will deny it. I, as a website owner, don't want to be in the defendant's chair. For you to sue whomever ran the third-party message requires your figuring out who ran it, and legally Microsoft may be off the hook if it didn't go through them. Even without a lawsuit, you may have to explain your way out of the consequences of something you never saw and can't find. Your general disclaimer may not be enough to avoid losing some of your visitors or losing a lawsuit for monetary damages. Since <span> can do the legitimate functions of <mark>, <mark> should be dropped or controlled with meta elements as proposed. I suggest dropping as the simpler solution. Thanks. -- Nick -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 8 June 2009 04:36:24 UTC