[Bug 6784] [blocked on webidl] WebStorage should include Window IDL for Storage APIs

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6784


Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|WebStorage should include   |[blocked on webidl]
                   |Window IDL for Storage APIs |WebStorage should include
                   |                            |Window IDL for Storage APIs




--- Comment #1 from Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>  2009-06-01 20:12:53 ---
I'm waiting for WebIDL to have a way to say "this interface bit is just an
extension of that interface bit" without having to have casting or a new
interface name or anything. Something like:

   interface A {
      void foo();
   }

   [Supplemental] interface A {
      void bar();
   }

...which would be exactly equivalent to:

   interface A {
      void foo();
      void bar();
   }

(The idea being to not let details of the specification organisation impact the
implementation requirements.)


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.

Received on Monday, 1 June 2009 20:13:00 UTC