- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 08:56:16 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5850 --- Comment #4 from Adam Barth <w3c@adambarth.com> 2008-07-10 08:56:16 --- > Yes, I do plan to specify that (indeed most of it already is) I searched the spec for a few key words, but I didn't find it. Can you give me a pointer? > -- but I don't > see why that would be especially difficult to spec. Do you have test cases > showing the complexity? Maybe it's more simple than I thought. Here are a couple test cases: http://crypto.stanford.edu/~abarth/research/html5/split/test01.html http://crypto.stanford.edu/~abarth/research/html5/split/test01.html Safari 3.1 seems a bit confused. I recommend trying one of the nightly builds instead. IE7 seems to avoid this case by not letting you call closures from old frames. Firefox 3 seems pretty aggressive about clearing out the old frame's objects (maybe to help garbage collection?). Opera 9.5 throws an uncatchable exception, which kind of messes up the tests. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 10 July 2008 08:56:50 UTC