[Bug 5834] provide normative advice on area element text alternative

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5834


Justin James <j_james@mindspring.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |j_james@mindspring.com




--- Comment #3 from Justin James <j_james@mindspring.com>  2008-07-05 04:34:41 ---
I think that this is a bad proposal for all of the reasons that we had a utter
mess with @alt in general a few months ago. Why should @alt for area describe
the destination? Why should/could it not describe the image being used for the
image map? Or something else entirely, such as, "please click the color that
you like the best?"

Furthermore, why *must* @alt be omitted for area without @href? Again, why
could it not simply be used to describe part of the image?

Folks, this topic keeps going around and around like a Canadian dime in a US
vending machine. You can't have your cake and eat it too. Either make a bunch
of granular attributes to *replace* @alt (such as @destination-description,
@long-description, @short-description, etc.), or stop trying to dictate the
contents of an immensely general attribute.


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.

Received on Saturday, 5 July 2008 04:35:14 UTC