- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 04 Jul 2008 05:33:37 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5822 Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|dave.null@w3.org |mike@w3.org Status|REOPENED |NEW --- Comment #14 from Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> 2008-07-04 05:33:37 --- I don't know what to tell you don't think the earlier comments are reasonable or if you don't think I've considered this properly. IMHO the table you provided can be quite adequately represented with the current markup, and while it is certainly the case that not _all_ tables can, certainly more than 80% can, and that's all we generally aim for with any feature in HTML5, in the interests of keeping things manageable and simple. Historically headers="" has been terribly badly used by authors. This leads to worse accessibility than no headers="" attributes at all. If the goal is to improve accessibility overall, rather than increase the maximum possible level of achievable accessibility, then we _must_ consider the impact of making the feature more powerful (and complex). In any case it isn't at all clear to me that it is possible to have good hierarchical UI for table headers, and it isn't clear to me that headers-of-headers are a good design. Furthermore, given that the current HTML5 algorithms allow one to accessibly mark up the sample data you provided without _any_ explicit accessibility attributes, it seems to be that we have made significant strides in the accessibility of tables in HTML already. Before we build on this, we should gain implementation experience and perform detailed studies of how people use the new markup, so that we know what we need to do to make things better. For example it may be that a new type of table cell which automatically acts as both a header and a data cell without any explicit accessibility attributes or without any explicit associations would be better than headers or scope. Reassigning to Mike for arbitration. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 4 July 2008 05:34:12 UTC