- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 03:39:07 +0000
- To: public-html-admin@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=29485
Bug ID: 29485
Summary: meta property attribute should be recognized in order
to constrain it
Product: HTML WG
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: CR HTML5 spec
Assignee: robin@w3.org
Reporter: Nick_Levinson@yahoo.com
QA Contact: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
CC: public-html-admin@w3.org
Target Milestone: ---
For the meta element with the property attribute, I'm concerned that someone
out there is going to use both attributes (name and property) for the same
value strings but with different meanings. Unless creating the property
attribute was simply a mistake, that's the likeliest use, and it's likely even
if it was a mistake since it's now available to future developers. For now,
we're stuck with hoping for the best with it, especially since Facebook and
Google are supporting it and they're big players.
Would it help nip this in the bud if HTML5 were to state that the two
attributes are interchangeable and therefore are not to both be used in the
same element and that value strings for both shall have the same meanings? Or
should the WHATWG MetaExtensions page (because it's linked to from HTML5) be
explicitly expanded to require (or try to require) registration of property
values? Or both? Or should property be deprecated now and reserved for possibly
some undefined future use?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Friday, 19 February 2016 03:39:09 UTC