W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-admin@w3.org > January 2015

Re: Future of HTML Form HTTP Extensions

From: Cameron Jones <cmhjones@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2015 15:43:37 +0000
Message-ID: <CALGrgevW0NUHyu7QZ8wf=L-gMW0H8UO0C1ZZO_4s97nOhFZCng@mail.gmail.com>
To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
Cc: "public-html-admin@w3.org" <public-html-admin@w3.org>
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 2:50 PM, Cameron Jones <cmhjones@gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
> On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 6:18 PM, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net> wrote:
>>
>> On 11/28/2014 06:50 AM, Cameron Jones wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Hi Paul,
>>>
>>> Apologies for the delay in reply.
>>>
>>> I regard the extension specification as completed barring any further
>>> bug reports or other feedback. There has been no further edits as all
>>> feedback and issues have been addressed.
>>>
>>> I plan to continue to keep the document up to date and addressing
>>> anything which may come up. I would ideally like to see some
>>> implementations which i am also able to support in an ancillary manner.
>>>
>>> Open to any further progress or process for the specification, any
>>> recommendations much appreciated.
>>>
>>
>> Would you be OK with moving this to the 2014 process?  If so, the next
>> step would be Candidate Recommendation.  The requirements for that are
>> documented here:
>>
>>     http://www.w3.org/2014/Process-20140801/#last-call
>>
>
> Sure.
>
>
>>
>> In particular, I'd like to draw your attention to the following bullet:
>>
>>     must document how adequate implementation experience will be
>>     demonstrated
>>
>> What are your thoughts on this?
>>
>>
>
> I haven't made any specific inquires to vendors regarding implementation
> interest. Until this point the work has been in completing the
> specification and having it open for review and feedback from all.
>
> Given the progress and stability of the document, and further progression
> towards CR, perhaps it would be useful to now solicit what interest there
> is from vendors? I could put out a "call for implementation interest" on
> public-html to see what the responses are?
>
> To date there has been no direct feedback from vendors, i'm not sure if
> this represents lack of interest or prudence in waiting for specification
> stability. Getting some clarity in this area should provide some light on
> where the document is heading regarding the CR implementation experience.
>
>

I'll proceed with initiating a "call for implementation interest" on
public-html.

Thanks,
Cameron Jones






> Thanks,
> Cameron Jones
>
>
>
>
>>  Thanks,
>>> Cameron
>>>
>>
>> - Sam Ruby
>>
>
Received on Tuesday, 6 January 2015 15:44:08 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:57:30 UTC