Re: New ED for HTML 5.1

+1 to changing to the new process document.  And I don't think a delay of a
week for the hearbeat is that unreasonable.

On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 3:29 PM, Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
wrote:

>
> On 28 Feb 2015 03:52, "Robin Berjon" <robin@w3.org> wrote:
> >
> > On 27/02/2015 17:38 , Paul Cotton wrote:
> >>
> >> My recommendation that HTML 5.1 should refer to the older Process
> >> Document stands UNTIL the WG decides otherwise (or is rechartered).
> >
> >
> > Is there anything preventing the group from deciding right now? It's not
> a huge change and it's quite convenient. Also, it's been announced in the
> plan for a long while now.
> >
>
> +1
>



-- 
Shane McCarron
Managing Director, Applied Testing and Technology, Inc.