- From: <janina@rednote.net>
- Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2015 19:21:45 -0400
- To: HTML Accessibility Task Force <public-html-a11y@w3.org>
- Cc: "public-html-admin@w3.org" <public-html-admin@w3.org>, W3C WAI Protocols & Formats <public-pfwg@w3.org>
Hi, Steve, All: Looking at your email exchange with Paul below, and also sending out PF's (and the HTML-A11Y) CfC for this publication bring me to the conclusion that we should do a bit more to distinguish our ARIA (and HTML) docs, one from another. I'm noting not only the document titles in the exchange below, but also the document short names in the respective URIs ... Steven Faulkner writes: > Hi Paul, > > name confusion, This request is for ARIA in HTML, the HTML module spec, > which is not jointly published. > http://www.w3.org/TR/html-aria/ > > I also requested Using ARIA in HTML (Now called Notes of using ARIA in > HTML) to aid disambiguation. > http://w3c.github.io/aria-in-html/ > I suggest this doesn't cleanly disambiguate between the two because our (inherited) short name for the second ("Notes") document is now also the same as the full name of the first. I think this will continue to confuse. The first document title has: ARIA in HTML" The second document short name URI has: aria-in-html Can we look at these, and perhaps also the other relevant HTML/ARIA documents (such as the HTML-AAM) to clear up potential vectors of confusion as best we can before another heartbeat? I'm aware this would require another round of CfC, but might it not be worthwhile? Thoughts?? Janina -- Janina Sajka, Phone: +1.443.300.2200 sip:janina@asterisk.rednote.net Email: janina@rednote.net Linux Foundation Fellow Executive Chair, Accessibility Workgroup: http://a11y.org The World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI) Chair, Protocols & Formats http://www.w3.org/wai/pf Indie UI http://www.w3.org/WAI/IndieUI/
Received on Monday, 27 April 2015 23:22:10 UTC