- From: Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2014 10:48:01 +0200
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>, "public-html-admin@w3.org" <public-html-admin@w3.org>
Hi Julian, On 05/09/2014 16:50 , Julian Reschke wrote: > Well, I reported the issue, you flagged it as "later" (and as far as I > can tell agreed this is a problem). It is certainly a problem that sniffing is not better defined for the platform. I don't, however, believe that it is a problem for HTML. > It seems the only disagreement is whether this is serious enough to > block a transition to proposed recommendation. I feel it is (*), but I'm > not a W3C process expert. If this were a new feature that happened to be known to be broken and that we required, it would likely be a problem. But this is a reverse-engineering issue in which reality is insufficiently well-documented (and lacks interoperability, within reason). It doesn't stand in the way of progressing HTML. -- Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon
Received on Monday, 8 September 2014 08:48:11 UTC