+1 I am disappointed that we are sitting on this document and have been since June. There's just no excuse. On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 9:13 AM, David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca> wrote: > +1 > > Cheers, > > David MacDonald > > > > *Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.* > > Tel: 613.235.4902 > > LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100> > > www.Can-Adapt.com > > > > * Adapting the web to all users* > * Including those with disabilities* > > If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy > <http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html> > > On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 8:37 AM, Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org> wrote: > >> On 10/10/2014 14:01 , Steve Faulkner wrote: >> >>> As It is unclear when the document will be published as a note and what >>> direction the planned changes will take I consider it a reasonable >>> request that a heartbeat draft be published by the HTML WG before the >>> new editor(s) start work on the document. In its current form the >>> document accurately reflects the related advice on provision of text >>> alternatives contained in the HTML5 PR specification [1]. The current >>> HTML5: Techniques for providing useful text alternatives WD >>> http://www.w3.org/TR/html-alt-techniques/ is 2 years old and is largely >>> obsolete. I consider it an important of the review process to be able to >>> have a stable up to date snapshot of the document in its current form >>> available for myself and others who intend to contribute feedback as the >>> document changes. >>> >> >> +1 >> >> We shouldn't let documents languish without updates for any length of >> time, let alone two years, particularly when we do have an update. A >> heartbeat is a heartbeat and if there's a new one coming then it can ship >> whenever it's ready. >> >> I can't wait for automatic publication on commits! >> >> -- >> Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon >> >> >> >
Received on Friday, 10 October 2014 14:30:45 UTC