Re: clarification sought on publishing alt text document as a WG note

On 10/08/2014 03:57 PM, Janina Sajka wrote:
>
> The process did not fail. You've simply forgotten the PF componant in
> the process. Without it, the HTML-WG cannot proceed.

Point of clarification: this is not a document that is produced jointly 
with PFWG, nor is this document owned by this task force.  See, for 
example, the third bullet in the "Accessibility Task Force" section of 
"Plan 2014"[1].

At the current time, the HTML WG chairs are aware of concerns expressed 
by members of the PF, and have decided to give PFWG an opportunity to 
make a proposal on how to proceed.  Any such proposal would need to go 
to the HTML WG.

> PS: This is pretty much a standing agendum on the TF call. As always, you are
> welcome to discuss this with the TF there.

It also has proven to be a pretty much standing agendum in the HTML WG 
telecon.  In fact, it is on the agenda[2] this week as item 6b.

- Sam Ruby

[1] http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/html5-2014-plan.html#a11y-tf
[2] 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-wg-announce/2014OctDec/0001.html

Received on Wednesday, 8 October 2014 20:30:28 UTC