Re: FPWD Publication of HTTP Form Extensions

Hi Sam,


On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 8:32 PM, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net> wrote:

> On 04/30/2014 10:27 AM, Cameron Jones wrote:
>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> I would like to submit the HTTP Form Extensions specification for
>> publication as a First Public Working Draft from the latest editors
>> draft here:
>>
>> http://cameronjones.github.io/form-http-extensions/index.html
>>
>> The latest technical discussion with relevant links can be found here:
>>
>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2014Apr/0068.html
>>
>> I'd also like to request for the document to be published using the new
>> 'dual license'.
>>
>
> I'm assuming that the intent is to have this on the rec track?
>
>
Yes, that is the intent given the changes to the form submission process
which would seem to necessitate folding back in given the exit criteria.


> While not required at this point (I'm just being proactive), has any
> thought been given to test suites and CR exit criteria?
>

Test suites can be written in advance of implementations, it should be
useful as another source for development. However, I'm not sure what is
currently supported in the test harness; there may be some cases which are
currently untestable due to the requirement for HTTP.

I expect the same CR exit criteria would be appropriate as for HTML5.

Thanks,
Cameron Jones



>
>  Thanks,
>> Cameron Jones
>>
>
> - Sam Ruby
>
>