On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 3:11 PM, Jens O. Meiert <jens@meiert.com> wrote: > > The WHATWG is the reason we have this document today and continues > > to be the major driving force behind it. > > +1. I think this deserves more emphasis. > I have no objection to acknowledging the contributions of the participants from the WHATWG "activity" or "community group" or whichever label one wishes to apply. I also have no interest in debating the value of those contributions, which are clearly apparent. However, the purpose of the SOTD section is not to acknowledge contributions but to provide status about the document in terms customary to other W3C RECs. Acknowledging contributions should be done instead in the Acknowledgments section, which express purpose it serves. In any case, as Sam asks, I will follow up with a bug report that is more precise about what could be improved in the SOTD. > > -- > Jens O. Meiert > http://meiert.com/en/ > >
Received on Friday, 28 March 2014 01:30:46 UTC