W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-admin@w3.org > March 2014

Re: ISSUE-151: whatwg-references - Decision

From: Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2014 19:29:57 -0600
Message-ID: <CACQ=j+csXJCQJOg4T42Li+u9bC7yF5mCBah--Q-bjpRyh5GtFQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Jens O. Meiert" <jens@meiert.com>
Cc: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, "public-html-admin@w3.org" <public-html-admin@w3.org>, Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org>
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 3:11 PM, Jens O. Meiert <jens@meiert.com> wrote:

> > The WHATWG is the reason we have this document today and continues
> > to be the major driving force behind it.
>
> +1. I think this deserves more emphasis.
>

I have no objection to acknowledging the contributions of the participants
from the WHATWG "activity" or "community group" or whichever label one
wishes to apply. I also have no interest in debating the value of those
contributions, which are clearly apparent. However, the purpose of the SOTD
section is not to acknowledge contributions but to provide status about the
document in terms customary to other W3C RECs. Acknowledging contributions
should be done instead in the Acknowledgments section, which express
purpose it serves.

In any case, as Sam asks, I will follow up with a bug report that is more
precise about what could be improved in the SOTD.


>
> --
> Jens O. Meiert
> http://meiert.com/en/
>
>
Received on Friday, 28 March 2014 01:30:46 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:57:26 UTC