Re: ISSUE-151: whatwg-references - Decision

On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 2:33 PM, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net> wrote:

> On 03/19/2014 09:36 AM, Sam Ruby wrote:
>
>> Since this email has been sent out, the new editors have been appointed
>> and the WG charter was finalized.  Additionally, the new editors have
>> made significant updates to the status section in ways that may address
>> this issue.
>>
>> If this issue is important to you, please check the current document and
>> work with the editors (either by responding to this email or by opening
>> a bug).
>>
>> Once all feedback (if any) has been addressed, the chairs may chose to
>> issue a call for consensus.
>>
>
> As there has been no (as in ZERO) responses to this email, the chairs are
> choosing to interpret the silence as an indication that people are
> satisfied with the current wording of the status section.
>

Could you quote or cite the specific "wording of the status section" that
is being considered here?


>
> Should anybody have input they would like to provide at a later date on
> this matter, the chairs would encourage that input to be provided in the
> form of bug reports, and for those with input to work with the editors to
> resolve the concerns.
>
>  - Sam Ruby
>>
>> On 07/17/2012 02:41 PM, Paul Cotton wrote:
>>
>>> ISSUE-151: whatwg-references
>>>
>>> http://dev.w3.org/html5/status/issue-status.html#ISSUE-151
>>>
>>> The Chairs have decided to delay this issue until a) the new editors are
>>> appointed and until b) the revised WG charter is finalized.  In addition
>>> the Chairs propose to take this issue up no earlier than near the end of
>>> the next Last Call.
>>>
>>> /paulc
>>>
>>> HTML WG co-chair
>>>
>>> Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada
>>>
>>> 17 Eleanor Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K2E 6A3
>>>
>>> Tel: (425) 705-9596 Fax: (425) 936-7329
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>

Received on Wednesday, 26 March 2014 17:03:27 UTC