W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-admin@w3.org > March 2014

RE: Re-opening accessibility bugs

From: Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2014 16:50:23 +0000
To: Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org>, "lwatson@paciellogroup.com" <lwatson@paciellogroup.com>, "rubys@intertwingly.net" <rubys@intertwingly.net>, "mjs@apple.com" <mjs@apple.com>, "public-html-admin@w3.org" <public-html-admin@w3.org>, "'HTML Accessibility Task Force'" <public-html-a11y@w3.org>
Message-ID: <1bafaa5fb8484ec8bdca58ce960a7cc0@BL2PR03MB418.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Let's go ahead with Léonie's plan.

/paulc 

Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada
17 Eleanor Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K2E 6A3
Tel: (425) 705-9596 Fax: (425) 936-7329


-----Original Message-----
From: Robin Berjon [mailto:robin@w3.org] 
Sent: Friday, February 28, 2014 6:10 AM
To: lwatson@paciellogroup.com; Paul Cotton; rubys@intertwingly.net; mjs@apple.com; public-html-admin@w3.org; 'HTML Accessibility Task Force'
Subject: Re: Re-opening accessibility bugs

On 27/02/2014 19:22 , Léonie Watson wrote:
> One proposal is for the TF to move the bugs in question to the HTML 
> A11y TF component in bugzilla. This would clear them from each of the 
> legacy components they're currently logged against (Pre-LC1, LC1 
> etc.), but without moving them into the 5.1 component before it would 
> be appropriate to do so.
>
> We don't want to push these bugs back to the editors until we can 
> provide some tangible information for them to consider. Once the 
> information has been gathered though, we'd be in a position to move 
> the bug over to 5.1 and continue the discussion during the expected 
> lifecycle of the spec.

This all sounds like an excellent and very workable plan. Thanks!


--
Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon
Received on Thursday, 6 March 2014 16:50:57 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:57:26 UTC