Re: CfC: Request transition of HTML5 to Candidate Recommendation

I am in favor of this transition.  However, I note that there remains a
reference to microdata in the acknowledgements.  Filed a bug [1]

[1] https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=26371


On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 10:36 AM, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net> wrote:

> In accordance with both the W3C process's requirement to record the
> group's decision to request advancement [1], and with the steps
> identified in the "Plan 2014" CfC [2], this is a Call for Consensus
> (CfC) to request transition to CR for the following document:
>
> http://htmlwg.org/heartbeat/CR-html5-20140731/
>
> For reference, here is a list of bugs addressed during the previous LC for
> this document:
>
> https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/buglist.cgi?component=
> HTML5%20spec&list_id=40771&product=HTML%20WG&query_format=advanced&target_
> milestone=LC
>
> Silence will be taken to mean there is no objection, but positive
> responses are encouraged. If there are no objections by Wednesday July
> 23rd, this resolution will carry.
>
> Considerations to note:
>
> - A request to advance indicates that the Working Group believes the
> specification is stable and appropriate for implementation.
>
> - The specification MAY still change based on implementation experience.
>
> - Sam Ruby, on behalf of the W3C co-chairs
>
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/tr.html#transition-reqs
> [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2012Oct/0026.html
>
>