- From: Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>
- Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2014 17:49:28 +0000
- To: "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>
- CC: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, "public-html-admin@w3.org" <public-html-admin@w3.org>
> Could you at least publish a stable document before asking the WG to claim that it is stable? The CfC does point to a 'stable' document that will be used for the CfC and the transition request to the Director. See: http://htmlwg.org/heartbeat/CR-html5-20140731/ The CfC also give a list of the bugs that were resolved as part of the 'final' Last Call: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/buglist.cgi?component=HTML5%20spec&list_id=40771&product=HTML%20WG&query_format=advanced&target_milestone=LC /paulc Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada 17 Eleanor Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K2E 6A3 Tel: (425) 705-9596 Fax: (425) 936-7329 -----Original Message----- From: Roy T. Fielding [mailto:fielding@gbiv.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2014 1:44 PM To: Paul Cotton Cc: Sam Ruby; public-html-admin@w3.org Subject: Re: CfC: Request transition of HTML5 to Candidate Recommendation On Jul 16, 2014, at 10:35 AM, Paul Cotton wrote: > We did the "final" Last Call as planned. We just exited from that Last Call yesterday. Huh, I completely missed it -- one of the many problems with buying a house, I guess. It's a pity that the current draft still has normative dependencies to non-standard specs. :( Could you at least publish a stable document before asking the WG to claim that it is stable? I mean, publish the results of LC first before making the request for CR. ....Roy
Received on Wednesday, 16 July 2014 17:50:10 UTC