Re: Public Warning - Discussion Guidelines

After having seen the advance of a heartbeat without consensus
achievement... and ignoring "late arriving" issues... everything is
possible. So do as you wish. I'll find other ways of communication.

This is disgusting. If I am not allowed to use the term "double speaking"
how can I describe what is happening here?


2013/9/30 Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>

> A number of individuals either do not understand or do not accept that the
> Director has ruled EME as in scope.  The Director has not reconfirmed that
> decision[1].  Any responses that question this ruling will not be
> considered when evaluating the EME heartbeat CfC.  If you object to the
> Director's ruling, please take it up with the Director.
>
> Additionally, a number of responses included words such as 'deceit'[2],
> and 'double speaking pursuing your dark objectives'[3].  These responses
> are not consistent with the Discussion guidelines[4].
>
> This email will serve as a final public warning for Mhyst and Fred.  Any
> subsequent emails containing terms such as these will result in immediate
> loss of posting privileges to the HTML WG mailing lists.
>
> - Sam Ruby
>
> [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/**Public/public-html-admin/**
> 2013Sep/0129.html<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-admin/2013Sep/0129.html>
> [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/**Public/public-html-admin/**
> 2013Sep/0114.html<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-admin/2013Sep/0114.html>
> [3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/**Public/public-html-admin/**
> 2013Sep/0130.html<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-admin/2013Sep/0130.html>
> [4] http://www.w3.org/html/wg/**wiki/DiscussionGuidelines<http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/DiscussionGuidelines>
>