Thanks Sam. >these cases generally don't affect browser behavior. but they may effect other software such as conformance checkers. -- Regards SteveF HTML 5.1 <http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/master/> On 21 September 2013 11:49, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net> wrote: > On 09/21/2013 12:56 AM, Jens O. Meiert wrote: > >> Thanks for clarifying, Steve (also Robin and Sam). I’ll look for the >> <cite> discussion and may follow up again on public-html-admin@. >> > > Technical discussions (for example, how should the description of the > <cite> element be changed?) are welcome on public-html. > > Process discussions (for example, how can the HTML WG and WHATWG > coordinate better) are welcome on public-html-admin. > > Meanwhile, I've cloned the following bugs: > > https://www.w3.org/Bugs/**Public/show_bug.cgi?id=23008<https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=23008>=> > https://www.w3.org/Bugs/**Public/show_bug.cgi?id=23313<https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=23313> > > https://www.w3.org/Bugs/**Public/show_bug.cgi?id=23175<https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=23175>=> > https://www.w3.org/Bugs/**Public/show_bug.cgi?id=23314<https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=23314> > > https://www.w3.org/Bugs/**Public/show_bug.cgi?id=22996<https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=22996>=> > https://www.w3.org/Bugs/**Public/show_bug.cgi?id=23315<https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=23315> > > Two possible outcomes here. Most likely, the specs are evolving at a > different rates. Less likely, but does occur, the HTML WG and WHATWG come > to different conclusions; these cases generally don't affect browser > behavior. > > I will state that the HTML WG editors aggressively "cherry pick" changes > from the WHATWG specification. > > - Sam Ruby > > >Received on Saturday, 21 September 2013 11:59:44 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:57:24 UTC