W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-admin@w3.org > September 2013

[Bug 23314] New: Use of <cite> in <blockquote> has conflicting semantics

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2013 10:45:52 +0000
To: public-html-admin@w3.org
Message-ID: <bug-23314-2495@http.www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/>

            Bug ID: 23314
           Summary: Use of <cite> in <blockquote> has conflicting
           Product: WHATWG
           Version: unspecified
          Hardware: All
                OS: All
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: HTML
          Assignee: ian@hixie.ch
          Reporter: rubys@intertwingly.net
        QA Contact: contributor@whatwg.org
                CC: faulkner.steve@gmail.com, josh@joshtumath.me.uk,
                    mike@w3.org, public-html-admin@w3.org,
        Depends on: 23175

+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #23175 +++

The recent changes in the definitions of <cite> and <blockquote> have been a
massive improvement. However, consider the following example:

    Who is your favourite doctor (in <cite>Doctor Who</cite>)?
    - <cite>John Smith</cite>

We can see that, in that blockquote, there are two different uses for <cite>.
The first represents the title of a work, and the second represents the source
of the quote. Therefore, there is no semantic way to differentiate between the
former and latter meaning.

Therefore, I'd like to propose that it should be a requirement for authors to
specify the source of a quote inside the <footer> element; rather than this
just being optional.

Note that this is not a problem with inline quotes, because the <cite> would be
outside the quote tags:

  <q>Who is your favourite doctor (in <cite>Doctor Who</cite>)?</q>
  - <cite>John Smith</cite>

You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Saturday, 21 September 2013 10:45:54 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:57:24 UTC