Re: CfC: Publish three heartbeat drafts as WDs

On Wed, 11 Sep 2013 04:05:48 +0400, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>  
wrote:

> On 09/10/2013 07:36 PM, Janina Sajka wrote:
>> Dear All:
>>
>> I'm very disappointed to note that longdesc is still listed in the
>> obsolete (Sec. 11) of the HTML 5.1 nightly. Is this also the case with
>> the current crop of heartbeats?
>>
>> Surely everyone is aware that the TF's longdesc extension Las Call
>> expires Monday next?
>>
>> Can we please, please have this resolved immediately? As agreed?
>
> I encourage you to write a bug report.

See Janina's pointer to the bug report.

> I'm confident that such will be handled appropriately.

Me too. And if not, I happen to know where Robin lives. I am sure I can  
use that information to expedite resolution if it should be really  
necessary.

Seriously, this looks like we just dropped balls over the summer. But I  
agree with Janina, it's getting frustrating.

cheers

> As to what we agreed to previously, here is what plan 2014 states:
>
>    If such a specification obtains consensus and meets the proposed CR
>    exit criteria by 2014Q2 it could be folded back into the core HTML
>    spec by that time.
>
> http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/html5-2014-plan.html
>
>> Janina
>
> - Sam Ruby
>
>> Janina Sajka writes:
>>> Hi, Robin:
>>>
>>> Robin Berjon writes:
>>>> Hi Janina,
>>>>
>>>> On 24/05/2013 18:12 , Janina Sajka wrote:
>>>>> I will withdraw my objection at this time in the interest of  
>>>>> preserving
>>>>> and furthering the comity that has arisen among us since Plan 2014.
>>>>
>>>> Thank you.
>>>>
>>> Well, it's not my intent to throw a major monkey-wrench into the works.
>>> Perhaps we should have inquired about prioritization and communicated
>>> our expected timelines before.
>>>
>>>>> While I do not think anyone is intentionally delaying here, continued
>>>>> delay does exaserbate W3C accessibility messaging. Also, we're now
>>>>> quite likely to have a Last Call for HTMl Image Description  
>>>>> published before
>>>>> another HTML heartbeat is published.
>>>>
>>>> What is your time frame for LC? We're not really constrained as to
>>>> the minimal amount of time between heartbeats.
>>>>
>>> We're expecting LC late June. We further expect to prepare our CR
>>> implementation report during LC, so that we may well go to PR late
>>> August/early September, skipping CR.
>>>
>>>>> Is there any reason it's unreasonable to expect this bug to be  
>>>>> resolved
>>>>> before the NEXT publication milestone?
>>>>
>>>> No, I wouldn't think so. As I said, it hasn't been handled either
>>>> high or low priority. I (and as far as I know, the other editors
>>>> too) tend to proceed by fixing blocks of bugs that are on related
>>>> topics. We can certainly handle this bug soon.
>>>>
>>> Thanks, Robin. That would be helpful.
>>>
>>> Janina
>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> Janina Sajka, Phone: +1.443.300.2200
>>>    sip:janina@asterisk.rednote.net
>>>   Email: janina@rednote.net
>>>
>>> Linux Foundation Fellow
>>> Executive Chair, Accessibility Workgroup: http://a11y.org
>>>
>>> The World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI)
>>> Chair, Protocols & Formats http://www.w3.org/wai/pf
>>>  Indie UI   http://www.w3.org/WAI/IndieUI/
>>>
>>
>


-- 
Charles McCathie Nevile - Consultant (web standards) CTO Office, Yandex
       chaals@yandex-team.ru         Find more at http://yandex.com

Received on Wednesday, 11 September 2013 20:13:03 UTC