- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2013 20:50:02 +0000
- To: public-html-admin@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=21438
Bug ID: 21438
Summary: Relocate the informative NOTE on authoring Best
Practices to where it is relevant.
Classification: Unclassified
Product: HTML WG
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
URL: http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/WD-html-longdesc-20130312/#l
ongdesc
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: HTML Image Description Extension
Assignee: chaals@yandex-team.ru
Reporter: xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no
QA Contact: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
CC: public-html-admin@w3.org,
xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no
The following NOTE section does currently occur after 4 pargraphs about how
User Agents SHOULD or MAY handle the longdesc attribute:
]] Best practices for full descriptions of images are beyond
the scope of this document, but there are many resources
available.[[
Please, instead, move the above NOTE so that it occurs ommediately after the
following paragraph:
]] Authors should put descriptions within an element which is
the target of a fragment link (e.g.
longdesc="example.html#description") if a description is
only part of the target document. [[
Justification:
* The cited NOTE section relates to authoring and should thus occur directly
after the normative information on authoring.
* It is particulary offputting that the cited NOTE section currently occurs
directly after a paragraphs about how User Agents MAY treat invalid longdesc
attributes. With the wrong glasses on, this could give the impression that is
OK for authors to fill the content of @longdesec with textual content (rather
than a URL).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Friday, 29 March 2013 20:50:05 UTC