Re: Formal Objection to Working Group Decision to publish Encrypted Media Extensions specification as a First Public Working Draft (FPWD)

Steve Faulkner, Fri, 31 May 2013 15:40:38 +0100:
> a correction
> 
> "EME can be a
> standard on its own, separated from and not required for the
> implementation of standards-compliant HTML."
> 
> This is the case for the current EME proposal, it is not a requirement for
> HTML, it is a separate spec. I don't know of any move to include in the
> core HTML spec and would imagine that such a move would not get consensus.

I think the above is a bit too square since HTML5 has the concept of 
applicable spec. It would only take a sentence or two to include EME by 
reference.

Leif H Silli

Received on Saturday, 1 June 2013 09:44:10 UTC