- From: John C. Vernaleo <john@netpurgatory.com>
- Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2013 16:01:10 -0500 (EST)
- To: John Foliot <john@foliot.ca>
- cc: 'Mark Watson' <watsonm@netflix.com>, "'Tab Atkins Jr.'" <jackalmage@gmail.com>, 'Ian Hickson' <ian@hixie.ch>, 'David Singer' <singer@apple.com>, public-html-admin@w3.org
On Fri, 25 Jan 2013, John Foliot wrote: > > Thus, I again ask that those who have objections to the proposed > Encrypted Media Extension specification limit them to specific technical > problems with the current draft under discussion (and I note that some > useful dialog has emerged from, among others, Robert O'Callahan), or, > barring that, take the use-case requirement and create an alternative > solution which can be brought forward as an alternative Extension Spec > for consideration. > Leaving aside the rest of your mail (which I'm sure someone else can reply to better than I), are you saying that we should not be allowed to decide if a proposal is appropriate in scope or material (or something else similar) for the working group? That seems to go against a lot of how I understood this to work.
Received on Friday, 25 January 2013 21:01:34 UTC