Re: CfC: handle ISSUE-207 responsive-images consistently with Plan 2014 from Silvia Pfeiffer on 2013-01-16 (public-html-admin@w3.org from January 2013)

From: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2013 10:49:59 +1100
To: Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com>
Cc: Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, "public-html-admin@w3.org" <public-html-admin@w3.org>, Mathew Marquis <mat@matmarquis.com>
Message-ID: <CAHp8n2kDj7qKNgKZtQUkiRgYCQ1ptWJit6a3_E2fPfz9nkMsbg@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 10:40 AM, Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com> wrote:

>
>
> On 16/01/2013, at 10:31 PM, Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> I also support handling all responsive image proposals the same way as an
> extension spec.
>
> In addition, I'd like to see a discussion by browser vendors and Web
> developers about their issues with either of these specs.
>
>
> At least 3 reps for the RICG will be on the call tomorrow. Will try to get
> a few more key individuals to dial in.
>

A discussion on the main email list would be more inclusive (in addition -
not instead of).

Thanks,
Silvia.

Received on Wednesday, 16 January 2013 23:50:45 UTC