- From: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2013 09:31:10 +1100
- To: Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
- Cc: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, "public-html-admin@w3.org" <public-html-admin@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAHp8n2k5yJ6gdqR8torm=9Oku1RmXwPMN6b6BHzFTbPFW2FGTQ@mail.gmail.com>
I also support handling all responsive image proposals the same way as an extension spec. In addition, I'd like to see a discussion by browser vendors and Web developers about their issues with either of these specs. Cheers, Silvia. On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 2:06 AM, Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>wrote: > I support the CFC > > regards > SteveF > > > On 16 January 2013 09:04, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com> wrote: > >> >> Based on a tracker request in < >> https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=18384>, we have an issue >> raised regarding responsive images, and a request to incorporate a >> responsive image solution into HTML5 as soon as possible, rather than >> proceeding via extension specs: >> https://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/207>. >> >> It seems that many in the Working Group have been satisfied to handle >> responsive images consistently with Plan 2014, by proceeding via extension >> specifications for possible later reintegration. Previously, the Working >> Group decided to handle many existing open issues in this way: < >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2012Oct/0026.html> >> >> At this time, the Chairs propose to decide by consensus to address the >> new ISSUE-207 responsive-images in the same way: by allowing extension >> specifications to proceed (as they already are) and by allowing an >> opportunity for future reintegration if the extensions can meet the HTML5 >> exit criteria. >> >> If you have any comments or concerns about this CfC, please respond by >> Wednesday, January 23rd, 2013. Positive response is preferred and >> encouraged and silence will be considered as agreement with the proposal. >> >> If your comment is an objection, please clearly state that. In accordance >> with the W3C Process, objections SHOULD cite substantive arguments and >> propose changes that would remove the objection. >> >> Regards, >> Maciej >> (on behalf of the HTML WG chairs) >> >> >> > > > -- > with regards > > Steve Faulkner > Technical Director - TPG > > www.paciellogroup.com | www.HTML5accessibility.com | > www.twitter.com/stevefaulkner > HTML5: Techniques for providing useful text alternatives - > dev.w3.org/html5/alt-techniques/ > Web Accessibility Toolbar - www.paciellogroup.com/resources/wat-ie-about.html > >
Received on Wednesday, 16 January 2013 22:31:57 UTC