RE: HTTP Forms Extension Specification

> Sure, that sounds great. I coined the shortname "form-http-extentions", if suitable.

I expect that "form-http" might be a better, easier to remember and type shortname since you yourself mis-spelt "extensions" in the above text!  ;<)  But if you want to stick with the longer form "form-http-extensions" it is fine by me.

I will let you know when we get the Bugzilla Component setup.

/paulc

Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada
17 Eleanor Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K2E 6A3
Tel: (425) 705-9596 Fax: (425) 936-7329

From: Cameron Jones [mailto:cmhjones@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2013 9:42 AM
To: Paul Cotton
Cc: public-html-admin@w3.org
Subject: Re: HTTP Forms Extension Specification

On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 11:18 PM, Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com<mailto:Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>> wrote:
First, I would like to encourage you to start a discussion on public-html@w3.org<mailto:public-html@w3.org> along the lines of the thread that Sylvia started on her proposal:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2013Feb/0210.html

Apologies, every time i start a new thread it seems to be the wrong place! I think i have it clarified now.


Second, in anticipation of needing to handle bugs on this proposed extension spec would you like us to create a Component in the HTML WG Bugzilla Product for this specification?

Sure, that sounds great. I coined the shortname "form-http-extentions", if suitable.

i've categorized the extension specification as 'unofficial' as i thought this was correct prior to any publication as a technical report.

Thanks,
Cameron Jones