W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-admin@w3.org > February 2013

RE: HTTP Forms Extension Specification

From: Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 16:07:08 +0000
To: Cameron Jones <cmhjones@gmail.com>
CC: "public-html-admin@w3.org" <public-html-admin@w3.org>
Message-ID: <AB5704B0EEC35B4691114DC04366B37F202AAD27@TK5EX14MBXC295.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
> Sure, that sounds great. I coined the shortname "form-http-extentions", if suitable.

I expect that "form-http" might be a better, easier to remember and type shortname since you yourself mis-spelt "extensions" in the above text!  ;<)  But if you want to stick with the longer form "form-http-extensions" it is fine by me.

I will let you know when we get the Bugzilla Component setup.


Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada
17 Eleanor Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K2E 6A3
Tel: (425) 705-9596 Fax: (425) 936-7329

From: Cameron Jones [mailto:cmhjones@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2013 9:42 AM
To: Paul Cotton
Cc: public-html-admin@w3.org
Subject: Re: HTTP Forms Extension Specification

On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 11:18 PM, Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com<mailto:Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>> wrote:
First, I would like to encourage you to start a discussion on public-html@w3.org<mailto:public-html@w3.org> along the lines of the thread that Sylvia started on her proposal:

Apologies, every time i start a new thread it seems to be the wrong place! I think i have it clarified now.

Second, in anticipation of needing to handle bugs on this proposed extension spec would you like us to create a Component in the HTML WG Bugzilla Product for this specification?

Sure, that sounds great. I coined the shortname "form-http-extentions", if suitable.

i've categorized the extension specification as 'unofficial' as i thought this was correct prior to any publication as a technical report.

Cameron Jones
Received on Friday, 22 February 2013 16:08:31 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:57:22 UTC