Re: CfC: to publish "HTML5 Image Description Extension" specification as a First Public Working Draft (FPWD) from Silvia Pfeiffer on 2013-02-20 (public-html-admin@w3.org from February 2013)

From: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 12:48:23 +1100
To: Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>
Cc: "public-html-admin@w3.org" <public-html-admin@w3.org>, "Charles McCathie Nevile (chaals@yandex-team.ru)" <chaals@yandex-team.ru>, "Janina Sajka <janina@rednote.net> (janina@rednote.net)" <janina@rednote.net>, "Michael(tm) Smith (mike@w3.org" <mike@w3.org>, Judy Brewer <jbrewer@w3.org>, Michael Cooper <cooper@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CAHp8n2mTDd5zhSoGVjPmMmvkEemth1=VojXdEX42ZHd0Hk_J4g@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 12:08 PM, Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>wrote:

>  >- As a Working Draft publication, the document does not need not be
> complete, to meet all technical requirements, or to have consensus on the
> contents.****
>
> All three of your points appear to be possible technical bugs against the
> HTML5 Image Description Extension specification.   Can you explain why they
> cannot be handled this way and why they should stand in the way of the
> FPWD?  ****
>

I guess I was a step ahead when thinking about how to merge this into the
specs. But we can indeed work this out while it's an FPWD.

I'm supportive.

Regards,
Silvia.

Received on Wednesday, 20 February 2013 01:49:15 UTC