W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-admin@w3.org > February 2013

Re: CfC: to publish Encrypted Media Extensions specification as a First Public Working Draft (FPWD)

From: Mark Watson <watsonm@netflix.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2013 00:43:13 +0000
To: "<robert@ocallahan.org>" <robert@ocallahan.org>
CC: "<public-html-admin@w3.org>" <public-html-admin@w3.org>, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
Message-ID: <2FB0A8FB-55CB-449E-8AB2-940D5D2EA348@netflix.com>

On Feb 10, 2013, at 9:55 PM, Robert O'Callahan wrote:

Sam Ruby wrote:
Examining the objections related to the question as to whether the
candidate FPWD contains enough information to be implemented
interoperably, the chairs found that much of the input on this has
lacked specifics, so at this time we are putting out a call for clear
and specific bug reports to be filed against the Encrypted Media
Extensions component in bugzilla[1] by February 15th.  Once that is
complete, we will seek an recommendation by the EME editors on how to
proceed with these bugs.

I'm not sure that taking discussion off-list into a bug is a good idea, but I filed https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=20944 as requested. If it's not clear and specific enough, please explain why so I can fix it.

There may be some questions/objections regarding the bug. Should I preemptively address them in the bug, or in an email, or will there be a chance to address them when/if they are made by the EME editors?

I'm confused about where we should take discussion of Robert's bug ? In the bug, on this list or on public-html-media ? Sorry if I missed this information in the fog today.


Wrfhf pnyyrq gurz gbtrgure naq fnvq, “Lbh xabj gung gur ehyref bs gur Tragvyrf ybeq vg bire gurz, naq gurve uvtu bssvpvnyf rkrepvfr nhgubevgl bire gurz. Abg fb jvgu lbh. Vafgrnq, jubrire jnagf gb orpbzr terng nzbat lbh zhfg or lbhe freinag, naq jubrire jnagf gb or svefg zhfg or lbhe fynir — whfg nf gur Fba bs Zna qvq abg pbzr gb or freirq, ohg gb freir, naq gb tvir uvf yvsr nf n enafbz sbe znal.” [Znggurj 20:25-28]
Received on Tuesday, 12 February 2013 00:43:42 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:57:22 UTC