Re: CfC: to publish Encrypted Media Extensions specification as a First Public Working Draft (FPWD) from Andreas Kuckartz on 2013-02-11 (public-html-admin@w3.org from February 2013)

From: Andreas Kuckartz <A.Kuckartz@ping.de>
Date: 11 Feb 2013 18:26:42 +0100
To: "Glenn Adams" <glenn@skynav.com>
Cc: "Henri Sivonen" <hsivonen@iki.fi>, "Mark Watson" <watsonm@netflix.com>, "public-html-admin@w3.org" <public-html-admin@w3.org>
Message-ID: <511929D2.1060804@ping.de>

Glenn Adams:
> Can you answer my first questions?
> 
> Are you suggesting that the W3C should set or limit business terms for how
>> content owners or content providers services provide their
>> content|services, for example, by eliminating the ability for a content
>> providers to use reasonable technical measures to protect against
>> unauthorized access to some content?

"reasonable technical meassures" is not defined - and I doubt that a
consensual definition could be reached. A Google company for example is
stating that "silent monitoring" is appropriate (and I suppose that they
would try to implement that in an EME CDM).

Cheers,
Andreas

Received on Monday, 11 February 2013 17:28:05 UTC