Re: CfC: to publish Encrypted Media Extensions specification as a First Public Working Draft (FPWD)

Perhaps this is something that needs to be discussed at the AC?

Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE Smartphone

-------- Original message --------
From: Andreas Kuckartz <A.Kuckartz@ping.de> 
Date:  
To: public-html-admin@w3.org 
Subject: Re: CfC: to publish Encrypted Media Extensions specification as a   First   Public Working Draft (FPWD) 
 
Sam Ruby:
> The chairs found that there were two categories of objections.  The
> first was that this was not the type of work that those that expressed
> this objection felt belonged at the W3C. ...
> For the first objection, the co-chairs sought advice from W3C
> Management.  The following email is the result:
>
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-admin/2013Feb
>/0122.html

That mail only deals with the question if EME is out of scope of the
HTML WG charter. It do not see a single word on the question if it is
inside or outside the scope of the W3C and the "Open Web Platform".

Cheers,
Andreas